MAP Membership Sign-Up

MAP membership is free, but is limited to staff and board members of LGBT nonprofits and/or major donors of the movement for LGBT equality. To qualify for MAP membership, donors must have contributed $10,000 or more to a single LGBT organization or cause within the last year. MAP requires that members maintain the confidentiality of, and do not publicly or otherwise distribute, any member-only materials. MAP also reserves the right to refuse or revoke membership of any individual or organization at any time.

 

To become a member, please provide us with the following information. Someone from MAP may contact you within the next 2 business days to verify your eligibility to become a MAP member. Click here to see our privacy policy.

 

Individual donors should list an LGBT organization/cause to whom they contributed at least $10,000 in the last year.
MAP occasionally emails members new reports and analyses. Would you like to be part of MAP's mailing list?
* - Required Field

Sign Up for Email Alerts of New MAP Reports

Please tell us a little about yourself. Click here to see our privacy policy.

 

* - Required Field

License to Discriminate: How Religious Exemption Legislation For Social Services Agencies Harms Children

The Bottom Line

The freedom of religion is one of our nation’s most fundamental values, which is why it is already protected in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Americans also believe in equal treatment, and while religious freedom is important, that freedom doesn’t give anyone the right to harm, discriminate against, or impose their beliefs on others. Yet many states have passed or are considering legislation that would allow child placement and adoption agencies to do just that, while providing government services paid for with taxpayer money

License to Discriminate: How Religious Exemption Legislation For Social Services Agencies Harms Children details how this type of religious exemption legislation hurts children. These laws encourage and enable adoption agencies and their workers to reject parents who don’t share the agency’s or worker’s religious beliefs instead of providing forever homes for children. As a result, children may remain in government group homes and foster care rather than being adopted by qualified parents. These laws also enable workers and organizations to prioritize their own religious beliefs when determining treatment options for children in their care. The potential for abuse of this legislation is far-reaching, as agencies and individual workers may have a very broad range of beliefs, and these laws would legally prioritize those religious beliefs over the best interests of children

Author

  • Movement Advancement Project